S. v. T.
The court set aside only the term fixing the purchase price of the mother's company shares because the father failed to disclose a relevant 2019 valuation (procedural unfairness under s.93(3)(a)), but upheld the remainder of the separation agreement. The valuation date for the shares is the date of the Agreement; the en bloc fair market value as of that date supports replacing the contract price with $812,500, less $609,608 already paid (balance $202,892). Parenting provisions were varied to reflect actual arrangements; child support and Guideline incomes were adjusted including imputation of…
Source excerpt
- Separation agreement enforcement
- Non-disclosure and procedural fairness
- Valuation of closely held company
- Imputation of corporate income for child support
- Spousal support review (miglin)
- Parenting arrangements and child support guidelines