Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellant failed to establish a compelling reason to depart from the established practice that appellants pay costs of an abandoned appeal because the purported settlement was inconsistent with the appellant's subsequent conduct advancing the appeal; accordingly the respondents are entitled to the costs of the appeal as assessed by the Registrar.
Source excerpt
The court dismissed a Rule 9-5 application to strike claims and cancel a CPL, holding the settlement required performance, not mere promise, and the pleadings could proceed.
The court dismissed an application to set aside a summary-trial judgment, finding the defendants failed to show a meritorious defence and that justice required reopening the order.
Leave to appeal was refused because the General Division did not make an arguable error of law; it correctly applied the legal test for misconduct and reasonably concluded the Claimant intentionally ignored a clear employer direction, and a private settlement does not alter entitlement to EI benefits or preclude a finding of misconduct.
Source excerpt
The court dismissed the defendant’s application to rescind a settlement agreement, finding no duress and no fundamental breach of the non-disparagement term.
The Court refused to set aside a settlement and consent dismissal order, found CIBC complied with the credit-reporting terms, and awarded special costs to the defendants.
Appeal dismissed from a registrar’s payment order requiring Helen Chan Sun to pay $300,000 monthly toward a judgment debt.
The Appeal Division accepted the parties' agreement, supported by the psychiatrist's evidence, that the Appellant had a severe and prolonged bipolar disorder during the pre‑DUPE coverage period and therefore allowed the appeal and applied CPP s.42(2)(b) and s.69 to fix the deemed and effective dates of the pension.
Source excerpt
The court ruled on admissibility of supplemental records and affidavits in an extradition abuse of process application, allowing most material subject to deletions.
The court dismissed a petition for declarations that a union staff lawyer was the petitioner’s solicitor and that he owned the union grievance files.
Explore more
