Brar v. Kaler
Leave to appeal denied because the proposed appeal lacked sufficient significance to practice and to the action, did not meet the merits threshold given the discretionary nature of the chambers decision and record evidence of potential prejudice, and although oral submissions were limited there was no manifest unfairness or actual prejudice warranting appellate intervention; therefore it is not in the interests of justice to grant leave.
Source excerpt
- Divorce pending resolution of corollary relief
- Severance of issues
- Procedural fairness (audi alteram partem)
- Standard of review for discretionary decisions
- Prejudice from loss of spousal status
- Costs