On the totality of the evidence the accused occupied a position of trust as Youth Minister vis-à -vis the 17‑year‑old complainant, and he used that trust and influence to induce sexual activity; therefore the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt sexual exploitation contrary to s.153(1)(a) and sexual assault contrary to s.271 via vitiation of consent under s.273.1(2)(c).
The court found the accused guilty of sexual exploitation after accepting the complainant’s evidence, admitting similar-fact evidence, and finding a position of trust and authority.