Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Patent law 2016 FC 1129

Elbit Systems Electro-optics Elop Ltd. v. Selex ES Ltd.

The Federal Court dismissed Selex’s appeal from a prothonotary’s partial refusal to strike patent pleadings, finding no reviewable error under the applicable standard.

  • Inducement to infringe
  • Motion to strike (rule 221)
  • Damages including extraterritorial damages
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Pleadings
  • Motion-to-strike
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2016 FCA 215

Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology

The Federal Court of Appeal held that Aqua-Gem should be abandoned and the Housen standard governs review of discretionary orders by prothonotaries; applying Housen (deference unless error of law or palpable and overriding factual error), the motions judge did not err in upholding the prothonotary's order limiting each inventor's further examination to one half day by teleconference and the appeal was dismissed with costs.

  • Patent validity
  • Infringement
  • Discovery
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Prothonotary discretion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2009 FCA 27

Merck & Co. Inc. v. Apotex Inc.

The Federal Court of Appeal held that the Federal Court Judge erred in finding an entire waiver; on the facts partial disclosure did not cause unfairness and the materials were litigation work product and privileged, therefore the Prothonotary's refusal to compel answers was not clearly wrong and must stand; the appeal is allowed and the Prothonotary's order is upheld (Apotex's appeal dismissed).

  • Waiver of privilege
  • Litigation privilege/work product
  • Examination for discovery
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Fairness and consistency
Read case analysis
Patent law 2008 FCA 287

Novopharm Ltd. v. Eli Lilly Canada Inc.

The prothonotary correctly applied the Rule 222(2) relevance / Peruvian Guano test and properly exercised residual discretion to limit production of technically relevant documents unlikely to advance Novopharm's case; the Federal Court correctly deferred to the prothonotary absent a demonstrable error of principle or misapprehension of fact; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the prothonotary's order upheld.

  • Affidavit of documents
  • Rule 222 relevance test
  • Rule 227 further and better affidavit
  • Train of inquiry
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Case management
Read case analysis
Patent law 2005 FC 1687

Contour Optik Inc. v. Viva Canada Inc.

The Federal Court dismissed Viva’s appeal from a prothonotary’s discovery order in a patent case, upholding limited disclosure and confidentiality protections.

  • Discovery obligations
  • Implied undertaking rule
  • Confidentiality orders
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Affidavit of documents
  • Prior art disclosure
Read case analysis
Patent law 2005 FC 1348

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Apotex Inc.

Federal Court appeal on discovery in a patent inutility dispute over nefazodone. The Court upheld limited production of scientific side-effect documents and dismissed the appeal.

  • Utility/inutility
  • Documentary discovery
  • Relevancy and train of inquiry test
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Patent specification promises
  • Patent-utility
Read case analysis
Patent law 2004 FC 1220

Apotex Inc. v. Canada Inc.

Federal Court decision on an interlocutory discovery motion, applying the prothonotary review standard and upholding most relevance rulings.

  • Discovery relevance
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
  • Patented medicines (notice of compliance) regulations s.8
  • Provincial formularies
  • Damages assessment
  • Manufacturing process / patent infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2003 FCT 294

A Lassonde Inc. v. Sun Pac Foods Ltd.

La Cour fédérale rejette la demande visant à intervenir contre l’ordonnance du protonotaire, jugeant que les modifications sur les dommages punitifs n’étaient pas autorisées.

  • Trade-marks
  • Punitive damages
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Striking pleadings
  • Costs
  • Standard of review for prothonotaries
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.