Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2020 YKCA 2

R. v. Mitchell

Crown appeal in an impaired driving sentence was allowed in part. The Court increased custody from 120 days to nine months and the driving prohibition to four years.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Aggravating factors
  • Driving prohibition
  • Statutory minimums
  • Blood alcohol concentration as aggravating factor
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2015 NSCA 87

R. v. Oickle

The sentencing judge erred in law by failing to treat weapons in the immediate proximity of narcotics in a vehicle as 'carried' within s.10(2) CDSA; conditional/community sentences for s.5(2) offences are not available post‑2012 legislative changes; the sentence imposed was demonstrably unfit and the appropriate custodial sentence for the CDSA offences is two years imprisonment to be served in custody, but execution of that sentence is stayed given the exceptional circumstances and time already served under the court's orders.

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking
  • Conditional sentence
  • Aggravating factors
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Statutory minimums
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 ONCA 840

R. v. R.B.

The four-year global sentence was fit because the offences were serious, internet luring combined with making child pornography warrants increased punishment post-amendment, statutory minimums applied, and several aggravating factors (position of trust, careful planning, grooming and exploitation of poverty) justified consecutive sentences within a four-year global sentence; the sentencing judge applied the accepted approach to multiple offences.

  • Consecutive sentences
  • Mitigation and aggravation
  • Position of trust
  • Grooming
  • Statutory minimums
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Employment law 2006 BCSC 426

Bellman v. HMTQ et al.

Judicial review of an Employment Standards Tribunal decision failed. The Court held the release barred the vacation pay claims, found no duress or bias, and dismissed the petition.

  • Release and settlement
  • Vacation pay
  • Statutory minimums
  • Privative clause and standard of review
  • Duress
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.