Northern Health Authority v. du Plessis
The Court dismissed both the appeal and cross‑appeal because the central questions identified by the parties were predominantly mixed questions of fact and law arising from the arbitrator's factual findings and application of legal tests; the arbitrator reasonably concluded the PHO Order did not apply to the respondent given his unique factual arrangement and did not err in law in his interpretation; the cross‑appellant failed to identify an extricable question of law arising from the remedy award.
Source excerpt
- Frustration of contract
- Statutory interpretation
- Termination without cause
- Reasonable notice
- Repudiation
- Damages