Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 774

R. v. Maxwell

The court accepted the joint five‑year federal sentence because, applying Anthony‑Cook, the joint submission was on balance fit and not contrary to the public interest given the offender's extensive record, the aggravating facts of the instant offences, the Gladue report mitigation, and the agreed enhanced credit for pre‑sentence custody.

  • Break and enter
  • Masking with intent
  • Possession of stolen property
  • Dangerous driving
  • Dna order
  • Weapons prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 728

R. v. McQuarrie

Balancing denunciation, deterrence and protection of the public with rehabilitation, the court imposed 8 years 6 months (rounded to 3,100 days) on the robbery conviction, granted a conditional stay on the assault (Kienapple), credited pre-sentence custody at 1.5:1 (948 days served = 1,422 days credit) leaving 1,678 days to be served; imposed DNA sampling authorization, lifetime weapons prohibition and a no-contact order while in custody.

  • Robbery
  • Assault with a weapon
  • Kienapple principle (conditional stay)
  • Pre-sentence custody credit
  • Victim vulnerability
  • Weapons prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 653

R. v. Favelle

The offender's conduct—intentionally driving at the victim at high speed for approximately 10 seconds, using the car as a weapon in the context of an acrimonious intimate relationship, compounded by substance misuse, lack of insight and high risk of reoffending—placed her at the high end of moral blameworthiness (near murder). A custodial sentence of 10 years was required to denounce the conduct, deter others, protect the public and reflect proportionality; a Conditional Sentence Order was inappropriate. Ancillary DNA and a 10-year weapons prohibition were ordered.

  • Manslaughter
  • Dangerous driving
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Conditional sentence
  • Denunciation
  • General and specific deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 NSSC 108

R. v. Greenwood

The court accepted the true joint recommendation and sentenced Greenwood to 15 years custody on each count of manslaughter to be served concurrently, and, having found the combined remand time and time served equaled 15 years, declared the sentences served; ancillary orders for a mandatory DNA order and a lifetime weapons prohibition under s.109 were made.

  • Manslaughter
  • Guilty plea mitigation
  • Joint sentencing recommendation
  • Credit for time served
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Ancillary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 NSPC 7

R. v. Dermody

Court accepted that the assault began as a reasonable self‑defence response but escalated into disproportionate, dominant and vengeful conduct while the victim was defenseless and in custody; weighing aggravating (violence, victim defenselessness, occurrence in prison) and significant mitigating factors (traumatic history, mental health/addiction diagnoses, acceptance of responsibility, active rehabilitation), the sentence that is fit and proportionate is 10 months imprisonment to be served straight, followed by 12 months probation with specified conditions; ancillary orders (DNA, lifetime we…

  • Assault causing bodily harm
  • Self-defence
  • Proportionality in sentencing
  • Aggravating factors in custody
  • Mitigating factors and rehabilitation
  • Probation conditions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2542

R. v. Hayes

Sentencing after conviction for breaking and entering a dwelling and careless firearm storage; the court imposed 22 months’ custody, consecutive terms, and ancillary firearms orders.

  • Breaking and entering
  • Uttering threats
  • Careless storage of firearms
  • Weapons prohibition
  • Forfeiture
  • Victim surcharge waiver
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2438

R. v. Antonius

Sentencing for robbery involving a violent dog theft resulted in an 18-month conditional sentence order, house arrest, restitution, DNA order, and weapons prohibitions.

  • Robbery
  • Conditional sentence order
  • Restitution
  • Weapons prohibition
  • Dna databank order
  • Gladue factors
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2313

R. v. Grasdal-Hessler

Oral sentencing reasons for a guilty plea to sexual interference under s. 151 of the Criminal Code. The court accepted a joint submission and imposed three years’ imprisonment with ancillary orders.

  • Sexual interference
  • Sentencing principles
  • S.161 protective orders
  • Soira registration
  • Dna order
  • Weapons prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2550

R. v. Trembley

The court accepted a joint submission and sentenced Jordan Trembley to concurrent terms of 2.5 years for cocaine trafficking and 4 years for fentanyl trafficking.

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking
  • Fentanyl trafficking
  • Cocaine trafficking
  • Sentencing principles
  • Gladue factors
  • Forfeiture
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 633

R. v. Haughton

The application to assign counsel under s.684(1) was granted because the appeal raises arguable issues of mixed fact and law (notably whether s.727(1) notice was provided and whether a s.110 prohibition qualifies as a prior conviction under s.109(3)), the existing record is unclear on key factual and legal questions, and the applicant lacks the financial means to retain counsel; these factors make it desirable in the interests of justice that counsel be assigned.

  • Weapons prohibition
  • S.109 criminal code
  • S.684 appointment of counsel
  • S.727 notice of enhanced penalty
  • Discretionary s.110 prohibition
  • Eligibility for legal aid
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.