Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law 2021 SCC 17

R. v. Desautel

The Supreme Court held that non-Canadian residents can assert s. 35(1) Aboriginal rights where they are modern successors of a people that occupied Canadian territory at contact.

  • Aboriginal rights
  • Section 35(1)
  • Van der peet test
  • Continuity of practice
  • Duty to consult
  • Sovereign incompatibility
Read case analysis
Constitutional law 2016 NLCA 25

R. v. Turnbull

Appeal dismissed and acquittal affirmed because (1) the bear was shot on inland waters within provincial territorial limits and therefore provincial wildlife legislation applied, and (2) on the facts found by the trial judge the accused established the due diligence defence on the balance of probabilities; errors by the trial judge regarding classification of polar bears and the burden of proof did not change this outcome.

  • Due diligence defence
  • Territorial jurisdiction
  • Division of powers
  • Wildlife regulation
  • Notice of constitutional question
Read case analysis
Constitutional law 2002 BCCA 63

R. v. Kupchanko

The Court of Appeal held that a provincial order limiting motorized conveyances on navigable waters was ultra vires to that extent and read it down.

  • Division of powers
  • Navigation and shipping
  • Interjurisdictional immunity
  • Paramountcy
  • Wildlife regulation
  • Regulatory validity
Read case analysis
Aboriginal law [1978] 1 SCR 104

Kruger and al. v. The Queen

The Supreme Court of Canada held that British Columbia's Wildlife Act applied to non-treaty Indians hunting off reserve on unoccupied Crown land, and dismissed the appeals.

  • Applicability of provincial laws to indians
  • Indian act s.88
  • Wildlife regulation
  • Aboriginal hunting rights
  • Royal proclamation 1763
  • Aboriginal-law
Read case analysis
Aboriginal law [1974] SCR 695

Cardinal v. Attorney General of Alberta

The Supreme Court of Canada held that Alberta’s Wildlife Act applied to a treaty Indian on a reserve under s. 12 of the Alberta Natural Resources Agreement.

  • Provincial legislation applicability
  • Indian reserves
  • Natural resources agreement (s.12)
  • Wildlife regulation
  • Aboriginal-law
  • Constitutional-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.