Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each charged offence because key allegations were undermined by material inconsistencies, implausibilities, lack of corroboration on central facts, and acceptable exculpatory evidence from the accused that raised reasonable doubt; accordingly the accused was acquitted on all counts.
Source excerpt
The court acquitted Dilpreet Singh Sandhu of impaired and dangerous driving charges after finding the Crown failed to prove he was the driver beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court acquitted Tyler Sampson Meldrum on all counts after finding the eyewitness identification evidence unreliable and insufficient to prove identity beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court dismissed a trial application to admit a late expert medical report about a witness’s cognition and refused to abridge service time.
The court found E.A.G. guilty of sexual offences against his daughter after accepting her evidence as credible and reliable on the core allegations.
Appeal from a conviction for sexual touching of a child. The court refused fresh expert evidence about mild cognitive impairment and dismissed the appeal.
In consolidated liability trials over a road collision, the court found Dean wholly at fault, held McQuillan was not negligent, and reserved costs.
The Court held the trial judge did not err in law or principle: she properly assessed credibility and reliability, did not misapply burden of proof, permissibly admitted limited Crown reply evidence, the identification and confession evidence supported conviction, and the six year sentence was within the appropriate range and therefore upheld.
Source excerpt
Explore more
