Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2003 BCCA 561

R. v. S.A.M.

The Court of Appeal affirmed a DNA databank order against a 17-year-old young offender, finding the record supported the order despite the trial judge’s lack of reasons.

  • Dna databank orders
  • Judicial reasons
  • Remedies on appeal
  • Sentencing
  • Young offenders act
  • Dna-databank-orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law C38473

R. v. Piette

The appeal was dismissed because the transfer judge's findings of fact were supported by evidence and the appellant failed to show the public could be adequately protected by the Young Offenders Act; the appellate court found no misapprehension or ignoring of material evidence.

  • Transfer to youth court
  • Young offenders act
  • Public protection
  • Standard of review
  • Findings of fact
Read case analysis
Criminal law C22630

R. v. H., M.

There was evidence to support the verdict and, notwithstanding inappropriate expression by the trial judge regarding reasonable doubt, the record shows he was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore the conviction and sentence stand.

  • Reasonable doubt
  • Unreasonable verdict
  • Appeal from conviction
  • Young offenders act
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 BCCA 626

R. v. F.(H.J.)

The Court of Appeal varied a youth sentence after finding it exceeded the Young Offenders Act maximum by one month; the rest of the sentence was upheld as fit.

  • Robbery
  • Young offenders act
  • Sentencing principles
  • Deterrence
  • Illegality of sentence (exceeding statutory maximum)
  • Youth-justice
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 NSCA 100

R. v. J.W.M.

The custodial portion of the disposition was an error in principle because the trial judge relied on reasons (obtaining psychiatric assessment and improving school performance) that do not justify incarceration under the YOA; assessments and counselling can be ordered and supervised in the community, therefore the custodial sentence was set aside, restitution and probation upheld, and a probation condition added requiring mental health assessment and counselling as directed by the probation officer.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Young offenders act
  • Custody as last resort
  • Detention/remand
  • Psychiatric/psychological assessment
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Civil C36851

Santokie v. Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the underlying landlord and tenant dispute had been resolved, there was no continuing risk of publication of the young person's identity, and the discretionary exceptions to the mootness doctrine did not apply as the issue was not likely to recur between the same parties nor was the appellant's interest sufficient to justify the Court hearing a moot appeal.

  • Mootness
  • Publication of identity
  • Young offenders act
  • Judicial discretion to hear moot appeals
  • Eviction
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2001 BCSC 956

R. v. L.( V.T.)

Sentencing reasons for a youth convicted of second degree murder, considering rehabilitation, deterrence, custody credit, and community supervision under the Young Offenders Act.

  • Second degree murder
  • Young offenders act
  • Custody vs community supervision
  • General and specific deterrence
  • Rehabilitation
  • Risk assessment and violent offender programming
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2001 BCSC 392

R. v. B.T.H.

Judge-alone trial on an attempted murder charge ended in acquittal because the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that B.T.H. was one of the shooters.

  • Attempted murder
  • Identification evidence
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Credibility
  • Reasonable doubt
  • Young offenders act
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2000 BCCA 656

R. v. D.J.

British Columbia Court of Appeal varied a criminal sentence after the intended treatment program was unavailable, reducing custody from 18 to 12 months and probation from 3 to 2 years.

  • Sentence variation
  • Probation limits
  • Young offenders act
  • Rehabilitation
  • Treatment program availability
  • Sentence-variation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2000 BCCA 387

R. v. J.G.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal considered whether six-month open-custody sentences for two first-time youth offenders were fit in a planned group assault.

  • Young offenders act
  • Custodial disposition vs alternatives
  • General deterrence and denunciation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Restorative justice
  • Youth-sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.