Heard v. Frasers Pro Home Centre
Claim dismissed because claimants reviewed and expressly approved the amended shop drawings before fabrication, accepted and incorporated the trusses into the building, failed to establish reliance on the seller's skill for a particular purpose or a breach of contract by Frasers, and had no contractual relationship with J.A.G.; accordingly neither defendant is liable and no costs are awarded.
Source excerpt
- Breach of contract
- Acceptance of goods
- Particular purpose reliance
- Shop drawing approval
- Damages
- Costs