Benzacar v. Terk
The motion judge erred as a matter of law by failing to treat 604’s garnishee statement as the equivalent of no statement where the statement falsely claimed no indebtedness despite existing salary and management fee entitlements; accordingly r.60.08(17) required an order directing 604 to pay the amount in the garnishment notice ($256,143.49) less amounts already paid to the sheriff.
Source excerpt
- Garnishment
- Wages exemption
- Garnishee statement
- Enforcement of foreign judgment
- Alter ego
- Corporate responsibility