Estates Associates Inc. v. 1645112 Ontario Ltd.
The motion judge did not err in principle or law in ordering security for costs because the appeal had a low prospect of success based on the trial judge's credibility findings, and Estates failed to prove it lacked access to funds despite evidence of prior financing and receipt of funds; the proposed evidence was not fresh and therefore did not undermine the exercise of discretion to order security.
Source excerpt
- Security for costs
- Impecuniosity
- Fresh evidence
- Discretionary review
- Appeal merits