Vokes Estate v. Palmer
Appeal dismissed because the trial judge's modified instructions were appropriate in the circumstances (defendant's excessive speed and difficulty detecting it), appellant's counsel failed to object at trial (or correct a mistaken legal impression about consent for a range instruction) thereby limiting appellate review, and the jury's awards, while high, were not so inordinately high as to warrant intervention.
Source excerpt
- Duty of care
- Highway traffic act s.139(1)
- Jury instructions
- Loss of guidance care and companionship
- Appellate review of damages