Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Municipal law 2026 ONCA 305

Clearview (Township) v. 12966344 Canada Inc.

The Court of Appeal granted a stay pending appeal of an order requiring a fill permit to issue, found the appeal arguable, and ordered it expedited.

  • Stay pending appeal
  • Ultra vires
  • Fill permits
  • Obstacle limitation surfaces
  • Jurisdictional division
  • Irreparable harm
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 BCCA 220

Percival v. Ti Developments Ltd.

Application for a stay was dismissed because the appeal and underlying judicial review were of little merit, there was insufficient evidence of irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience favoured the respondents given the appellants' delay and repeated procedural abuses; deference to Justice Hewson's discretionary case management decision warranted upholding the cancellation of the stay.

  • Judicial review
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Eviction
  • Res judicata
  • Procedural fairness
  • Balance of convenience
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 NLCA 14

Bell v. Ball

The application for a stay was dismissed because the appellant failed to establish a serious issue to be tried regarding the refusal to permit cross-examination, failed to show irreparable harm from the refusal, and the balance of convenience favored allowing the underlying proceedings to continue given deference to the trial judge's discretionary management and the public interest in proportionality and efficient use of court resources.

  • Stay pending appeal
  • Interlocutory appeal
  • Cross-examination of affidavit
  • Forum non conveniens/jurisdiction
  • Discretionary judicial decisions
  • Balance of convenience
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2026 CF 402

Pedraza Onate c. Canada (Immigration, Réfugiés et Citoyenneté)

La Cour fédérale rejette une requête en sursis de renvoi vers la Colombie, jugeant la preuve de préjudice irréparable insuffisante et la balance des inconvénients favorable aux défendeurs.

  • Stay of removal
  • Risk assessment before removal (erar)
  • Humanitarian and compassionate considerations
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Balance of convenience
  • Stay-of-removal
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FCA 53

Benison et al. v. Canada (Royal Canadian Mounted Police External Review Commitee) et al.

Appeal allowed in part: the Federal Court erred in requiring proof of significant prejudice to establish unreasonable delay and in finding no clear right and no practical effect; appellants established that ERC delay was longer than the nature of its process required and ERC failed to provide a satisfactory, case‑specific justification; mandamus will issue compelling ERC to render findings and recommendations in each appellant's appeal within six months (subject to reasonable extension); second mandamus to compel publication of all‑inclusive service standards denied because section 28.1 confe…

  • Mandamus
  • Unreasonable administrative delay
  • Service standards
  • Abuse of process
  • Balance of convenience
  • Prioritization of cases
Read case analysis
Partnership law 2026 BCSC 432

Chan v. Vintila

Application dismissed because petitioner sought mandatory relief but failed to show a strong prima facie case on the merits; petitioner established only a modest risk of irreparable reputational harm on an uncertain evidentiary basis; and the balance of convenience favoured respondent because granting the injunction would certainly destroy an ongoing profitable business, alter the status quo, and impose significant financial harm while the merits (including enforceability of the written partnership clauses) were not sufficiently in petitioner's favour.

  • Dissolution of partnership
  • Interlocutory mandatory injunction
  • Irreparable harm
  • Balance of convenience
  • Interpretation and enforceability of written partnership agreement
  • Ownership of digital content and accounts
Read case analysis
Family law 2026 BCSC 386

Block v. Block

The application for a stay was dismissed because the applicant satisfied the low threshold on merit but failed to establish irreparable harm and failed the balance of convenience: registrar findings and financial disclosure demonstrated the applicant had sufficient liquid assets and income to meet the immediate payment obligations, any harm was monetary and remediable, and the interests of justice and convenience favoured the respondent who would be deprived of the fruits of judgment if the stay were granted.

  • Stay pending appeal
  • Spousal support
  • Property division
  • Payment schedule
  • Registrar certificates
  • Irreparable harm
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 BCCA 131

Kong v. Siddoo Kashmir Holdings Ltd.

Application dismissed because appellant failed to establish a serious issue to be tried, provided no evidence of irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience favoured the landlord; a stay would not affect enforcement of the possession order and would permit resiling from a freely made settlement; chambers judge's discretionary decision was not shown to be in error.

  • Stay of proceedings
  • Order of possession
  • Settlement enforcement
  • Judicial review
  • Irreparable harm
  • Balance of convenience
Read case analysis
Property law 2026 BCSC 308

Aaron Yager Construction Ltd. v. Williams

AY Construction Ltd. established a strong prima facie proprietary interest in the Bobcat, steel I-beams and cutting torch based on documentary and corroborated employee evidence; Ms. Yager lacked title to sell; balance of convenience favored provisional return of the Equipment to AY Construction Ltd.; replevin ordered without security and subject to resolution at trial.

  • Replevin
  • Conversion
  • Detinue
  • Sale of goods
  • Nemo dat
  • Balance of convenience
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2026 FC 260

Yogesh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed a motion to stay removal to India, finding no serious issue on the PRRA challenge and no clear, non-speculative irreparable harm.

  • Pre-removal risk assessment
  • Stay of removal
  • Irreparable harm
  • Balance of convenience
  • Serious issue test
  • Evidentiary standards
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.