Zheng v. Kao
The application was dismissed because the roughly three‑year pause could not be characterized as inordinate or inexcusable in the factual matrix where both sides had taken no steps, and the defendants offered some explanation (counsel error and medical issues) and had documentary evidence; dismissal would be unfair where the plaintiffs likewise failed to progress their claim and statutory remedies exist to remove liens/CPLs from title without dismissing the counterclaim.
Source excerpt
- Dismissal for want of prosecution
- Builders lien
- Certificate of pending litigation
- Delay
- Costs