Canadian Energy Services L.P. v. Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc.
The Federal Court did not err in finding Levey to be the sole true inventor and that Secure holds title to the invention; declaratory relief under Rule 64 was properly characterized as public/declaratory (not remedial) and therefore not barred by limitations or discharged by the 2007 release; although the Federal Court incorrectly treated chain of title as res judicata from Secure FC 2021, Secure nonetheless proved chain of title from Genesis to Secure via corporate succession and the 2012 Asset Purchase Agreement; accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Inventorship
- Ownership of patent
- Section 52 patent act
- Declaratory relief vs remedial relief
- Chain of title
- Abuse of process