Coles v. Coles
The court exercised its discretion under Rule 77.03(3) and relevant authorities to award costs to Ms. Coles because, although overall success was mixed, she was clearly more successful than Mr. Coles and her settlement proposals were superior to the result achieved by him; a lump sum of $10,212 (approximately 57% of her billed fees of $18,060.92) appropriately affords a substantial contribution to her reasonable expenses and is ordered to be paid by Mr. Coles by March 31, 2021.
Source excerpt
- Variation of spousal support
- Child support termination
- Costs award
- Settlement proposals
- Jurisdictional limits on life insurance relief