Orrego v. Pearson
Claimant is entitled to time-limited compensatory spousal support because she sacrificed greater earning potential to work in the family restaurant and lost salary on separation; respondent's disability claim lacks causal connection and sufficient evidence and is undermined by investigator evidence, so non-compensatory support is denied; two years' duration is sufficient and a retroactive lump-sum of $22,750 (after tax-benefit discount) is appropriate; property division is resolved by transferring claimant's PRG shares and her shareholder loan to respondent, claimant retaining the TD savings…
Source excerpt
- Compensatory spousal support
- Non-compensatory spousal support (disability)
- Duration of support
- Retroactive lump-sum support
- Division of family property
- Shareholder loan