Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2024 FC 1309

Zhang v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a Public Service Commission fraud finding under s. 69 of the PSEA and upheld corrective measures.

  • Fraud under psea s.69
  • Corrective measures
  • Standard of review: reasonableness
  • Evidence and credibility
  • Judicial-review
  • Public-service-employment-act
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2020 CF 831

Cadostin c. Canada (Procureur général)

La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire intenté par M. Cadostin contre une décision de la Commission concluant à une fraude dans un processus de nomination.

  • Fraud under s.69 public service employment act
  • Judicial review of administrative decision
  • Procedural fairness
  • Charter rights (s.7, s.12, s.15, s.11(h))
  • Appointment revocation
  • Corrective measures
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2016 FC 1003

Shoan v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court set aside a harassment investigation report and corrective measures against a CRTC commissioner, finding procedural unfairness and bias.

  • Harassment policy
  • Jurisdiction of governor-in-council appointee
  • Investigative impartiality
  • Bias and reasonable apprehension of bias
  • Corrective measures
  • Confidentiality
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2014 FC 1230

Plato v. Canada (National Revenue)

The Federal Court dismissed Kelly Plato’s judicial review as moot after a CRA staffing dispute became academic and ruled no costs should be awarded.

  • Mootness
  • Reasonableness
  • Admission of additional evidence
  • Corrective measures
  • Third‑party review
  • Standardized assessment tools
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2013 FC 348

Plato v Canada (Revenue Agency)

The Federal Court set aside CRA’s corrective measures decision as unreasonable because it failed to remedy one of the staffing errors found in the review.

  • Independent third party review
  • Corrective measures
  • Staffing policy compliance
  • Reasonableness review
  • Transparency in hiring
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2011 FC 629

Canada (Attorney General) v. Beyak

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review, holding the Tribunal could make non-binding recommendations and that those recommendations were not reviewable on these facts.

  • Tribunal jurisdiction
  • Non-binding recommendations
  • Privative clause
  • Standard of review
  • Public service employment act
  • Abuse of authority
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2010 FC 399

McLaughlin v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court granted judicial review, set aside an Independent Third Party Reviewer’s decision, and remitted a CRA staffing recourse matter for redetermination.

  • Staffing process
  • Arbitrariness
  • Recourse/remedies
  • Procedural fairness
  • Corrective measures
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2009 FC 1251

Challal v. Canada (Attorney General)

La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la Commission de la fonction publique concluant à une fraude lors d’un test de nomination et imposant des mesures correctives.

  • Fraud in appointment process
  • Jurisdiction of administrative tribunal
  • Standard of review
  • Corrective measures
  • Procedural fairness
  • Access to documents
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2009 FC 573

Hughes v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of a Public Service Commission corrective-measures decision was dismissed. The Court found no unfair delay or bias and held the measures were reasonable.

  • Merit principle
  • Corrective measures
  • Standard of review
  • Bias / apprehension of bias
  • Delay / abuse of process
  • Reclassification
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2009 FC 574

Hughes v. Canada (Attorney General)

Federal Court upheld the Public Service Commission’s corrective measures in a staffing complaint, rejecting claims of undue delay, bias, and unreasonable relief.

  • Merit principle
  • Corrective measures
  • Procedural fairness
  • Apprehended bias
  • Delay/abuse of process
  • Staffing and appointments
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.