Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Property law 2020 BCSC 1215

Grenier v. Kamlands Holdings Ltd.

The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from entering Lot 13 or filling in the excavation pending trial.

  • Interlocutory injunction
  • Trespass
  • Irreparable harm
  • Balance of convenience
  • Design guidelines
  • Breach of contract
Read case analysis
Contract 2011 BCSC 62

Griffiths v. Sun Peaks Resort Corporation

The court dismissed the claim against Hartmut Berger and held that Sun Peaks’ breach did not cause additional compensable loss beyond the agreed $90,000 judgment.

  • Breach of building scheme
  • Design guidelines
  • Damages assessment
  • Injunction vs damages in lieu
  • Quid pro quo damages
  • Consent judgment
Read case analysis
Real property 2009 BCCA 121

Griffiths v. Sun Peaks Resort Corporation

The Court of Appeal dismissed Sun Peaks’ appeal, upholding liability for breach of contract after it approved a neighbour’s house without properly considering the effect on the Griffiths’ property.

  • Statutory building scheme
  • Design guidelines
  • Breach of contract
  • Discretionary approval
  • Standard of appellate review
  • Statutory-building-scheme
Read case analysis
Real property 2008 BCSC 640

Griffiths v. Sun Peaks Resort Corporation

The court held that Sun Peaks breached its obligations by approving a house plan without properly considering siting effects on privacy, view lines and overshadowing.

  • Statutory building scheme
  • Design guidelines
  • Duty of administrator
  • Negligent misrepresentation
  • Judicial review of discretionary approvals
  • Siting/privacy/view/overshadowing
Read case analysis
Property law 2006 BCSC 781

Sauve v. McKeage et al.

The court held that intermittent parking of a Fortis utility truck on a strata lot was not “storage” under the building scheme and was not a private nuisance.

  • Statutory building scheme
  • Storage restriction
  • Design guidelines
  • Private nuisance
  • Standing
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.