Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court dismissed a challenge to a post-nuptial marriage agreement, finding no material nondisclosure, no proven exploitation of vulnerability, and no significant unfairness.
The court enforced a family law settlement reached on February 20, 2024, finding the respondent’s counsel had authority and rejecting duress and unfairness arguments.
The court granted an interim distribution under s. 89 of the Family Law Act, finding the claimant economically disadvantaged and the claim reasonably arguable.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr. Hudema’s appeal, upholding summary trial dismissal of his family property claim based on an enforceable domestic agreement.
The court held that a signed family settlement was a binding agreement under s. 6 of the Family Law Act and refused to set it aside under s. 93 or common law duress grounds.
The court held that the Leungs’ personal communications with Lawson Lundell were not privileged, ordered a limited Rule 7-5 examination of Frans Lotz, and required Vantown to obtain and produce non-privileged emails from Lawson Lundell.
The court varied a marriage agreement’s pension terms, finding the agreement was signed under duress and undue influence and that the pension division was unfair.
The court rejected claims that disputed property was funded from family investments, found key financial records unreliable, and upheld the separation agreement.
The court upheld the parties’ prenuptial agreement, found a December 2010 settlement on property division, rejected an April 2011 memorandum as binding, and ordered support and parenting terms.
The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ action, holding that a broad 2004 release barred their claims against the Royal Bank and Terry Horton and that no genuine issue for trial remained.
Explore more
