Clouter v. Garrett
The court accepted expert evidence that the water flows in a naturally occurring defined swale predating the subdivision, so the Garretts did not commit a nuisance or trespass by directing water into that swale; conversely, the Plaintiffs' post‑development alterations (raising the secondary driveway culvert and infilling) unlawfully impeded the natural flow and constituted a nuisance, obliging the Plaintiffs to remediate (lower the culvert) and the Defendants to remove the encroaching portion of their French drain; no damages were awarded because remedial work will restore prior condition, an…
Source excerpt
- Nuisance
- Trespass
- Stormwater drainage
- Easements
- Injunctions
- Costs