Bail pending appeal granted to an appellant convicted of seven sexual assault counts and sentenced to 11 years, subject to strict release conditions and surety.
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to satisfy s.679(3)(b): he remains a significant flight risk who is unlikely to surrender into custody; the proposed surety was previously found unsuitable by a trial judge, nothing material has changed, electronic monitoring is insufficient to mitigate the risk, and the strength of the case and proximity to surrender increase his incentive to flee.
On a s. 525 detention review, the Supreme Court of British Columbia denied Michael Joseph Hasell judicial interim release, finding detention justified on secondary and tertiary grounds.
Detention review under s. 525 of the Criminal Code. The Court upheld Mr. Houle’s continued detention on the secondary ground and directed efforts to seek an earlier trial date.
Detention review under s. 525 of the Criminal Code. The court held the reverse-onus accused had shown a strict New Vision release plan could manage attendance and safety risks.
Detention review under s. 525 of the Criminal Code. The Court held Briaden Rosch should remain detained, finding a substantial risk of reoffending and that proposed release conditions would not adequately manage it.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia denied K.F.E.'s bail application, finding repeated breaches, absconding, and serious allegations justified detention pending trial.
The Federal Court dismissed the Minister’s motion to stay Abdi’s release from detention, finding no serious issue, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience.
The court released Mr. Merkley into a residential treatment program on strict conditions, finding continued detention was not justified on the evidence before it.