Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Court ordered a de novo spousal support review, found ongoing compensatory and non-compensatory entitlement, and varied support rather than terminating it.
Family law trial on valuation and division of business interests in Simetra and Triquest, with child support recalculated and spousal support dismissed.
In a family law trial, the court granted spousal support, imputed additional income to the respondent, and dismissed a property claim involving land in India.
Trial judgment on child and spousal support: the court reassessed interim orders, declined to impute income to the claimant, and ordered indefinite spousal support.
The court refused to terminate indefinite spousal support after a review, continued the respondent’s beneficiary designation on one life insurance policy, and terminated the child-related policy.
The court awarded the respondent 75% of her costs after finding she was substantially successful on the main family-law issues and that her offer to settle did not change the result.
The matrimonial assets and debts are to be divided equally between the parties: an updated appraisal of the matrimonial home is ordered and net proceeds/value at disposition will be equally divided; the respondent is entitled to spousal support but the quantum and duration are deferred pending stabilization and review of the parties' incomes and adjustment for debts paid post-separation by the petitioner; life insurance proceeds while policy maintained will be allocated one-half for the benefit of the respondent; the court retains jurisdiction to determine remaining financial issues once upda…
Source excerpt
On review, the court set both parties’ Guideline incomes at $96,000, adjusted child support for S.H., found K.H. was no longer a child of the marriage, and ended spousal support entitlement.
In this family law trial, the court granted a divorce and awarded the respondent $40,000 lump-sum spousal support after finding need-based support was justified.
The court found an oral agreement to keep property separate, but held equal division would be significantly unfair, ordering an 80/20 split and spousal support.
Explore more
