Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire : l’ARC a raisonnablement conclu que M. Ciaburro n’avait pas démontré 5 000 $ de revenus admissibles pour la PCU.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire du refus d’un visa de résident permanent, concluant que l’agente pouvait juger la preuve d’emploi insuffisante et qu’il n’y a pas eu d’atteinte à l’équité procédurale.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of CRA decisions denying CRB and CERB benefits, finding the applicant failed to prove the required $5,000 income and received procedurally fair treatment.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review applications challenging CRA decisions denying CERB and CRB benefits for lack of proof of $5,000 self-employment income.
The Commission failed to prove the alleged acts of misconduct with clear evidence; because the factual basis for misconduct was not established, the appellant was not disqualified under s.30 of the Employment Insurance Act and the appeal is allowed.
Source excerpt
The court found the Corollary Relief Order’s parenting time provisions to be clear and unequivocal, found the respondent had actual knowledge, and that the respondent intentionally breached specified parenting time provisions on the enumerated dates; other allegations failed for lack of admissible evidence or insufficient specificity and therefore the respondent was acquitted on those counts.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a CRA CRB eligibility decision, finding the officer unreasonably failed to assess the applicant’s sworn explanation for missing income proof.
The Appeal Division found no breach of procedural fairness because the limited evidence did not put the General Division on notice that medical proof of unsuitability was required, but it identified a factual error — the General Division overlooked evidence the claimant applied for work outside the fishing industry — that could affect the finding that he set personal conditions; accordingly the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the General Division to redetermine whether the claimant unduly restricted his job search (excluding any re-examination of availability limited by his sc…
Source excerpt
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed a damages appeal in part, substituting lower awards for future earning capacity, future care, and housekeeping loss.
The court found Zhi Ping Guo converted Champ’s Mushrooms’ stock, but reduced the damages for unreliable valuation evidence. The counterclaims were dismissed.
Explore more
