The appeal is dismissed because the trial judge did not err in allowing the defence to test the plaintiff's character after the plaintiff opened the issue; any improper remark by a defence psychiatrist was not relied upon in the charge and did not warrant a new trial; the jury was properly and clearly instructed on causation and the differing standard for future damages; the trial judge properly exercised gatekeeping on experts and on admissibility of medical opinions in records; and the trial judge's costs order was not plainly wrong.