Kepa v. Catlin
Amended civil claim struck for excessive, repetitive and speculative pleading, but leave to amend was granted with strict limits; limitation and provincial liability issues were not finally decided.
- Strike under rule 9-5
- Pleading requirements
- Misfeasance in public office
- False arrest and malicious prosecution
- Qualified immunity under police act s.21
- Crown liability under police act s.11