Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Appeal from a mortgage-debt judgment dismissed. The Court of Appeal held the trial judge’s factual findings were not shown to be overridingly wrong and that a power of sale did not bar the claim.
Costs reasons following a family trial: special costs refused, double costs ordered from April 18, 2024, and $12,500 in trust paid to the claimant.
The court granted a divorce, upheld the parties’ marriage agreement, rejected unconscionability and forgery claims, and denied a share of the Kamloops property while awarding the Cadillac to the respondent.
The fixed-term lease expiring April 30, 2024 was not renewed by clear agreement; the tenants failed to establish a binding renewal contract or sufficient evidence of forgery or compensable loss; therefore the Director's Order terminating tenancy and ordering vacant possession effective May 31, 2024 is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The court found the parties were not spouses under the Family Law Act. Alternatively, any marriage-like relationship ended by August 28, 2016, so the claim was out of time.
The court conditionally struck Archer Cleantech Inc.’s response and counterclaim for discovery non-compliance, then granted default judgment unless Archer complied within 14 days.
The appeal was dismissed because the application judge's factual findings were supported by the evidence: the parties did not cohabit continuously for three years, there was insufficient evidence of unpaid contributions or juristic reason to establish unjust enrichment, there was no economic integration or pooling to support a joint family venture, and the share transfer was corroborated as voluntary; there was no basis to infer improper reliance on respondent's submissions or palpable and overriding error.
Source excerpt
The court upheld a written August 10, 2014 construction agreement, rejected a forgery defence, awarded unpaid balance, GST, and payment for later extra work.
The court found a binding contract to sell 2599 Marine Drive, held Gurdaver Hothi was a bare trustee, and ordered specific performance against the sellers.
The Court of Appeal upheld the finding that Sahba signed the assignment, refused fresh evidence, rejected new contract challenges, and reduced part of the costs award.
Explore more
