Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2026 FC 291

Makrikostas v. Canada (Border Services Agency)

The Federal Court struck out Maria Makrikostas’s judicial review as premature, finding the CBSA letter was an interim step and the grievance process under the FPSLRA was available.

  • Grievance process
  • Adequate alternative remedy
  • Prematurity and interlocutory relief
  • Statutory bar to civil action (s.236 fpslra)
  • Admissibility of affidavit on strike motion
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 52

Scherf v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court granted judicial review, finding the Final Authority’s brief grievance decision unreasonable because it failed to meaningfully address the applicant’s detailed submissions.

  • Reasonableness review
  • Procedural fairness
  • Grievance process
  • Adoption of reasons by appellate decision maker
  • Remission for redetermination
  • Reasonableness-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 2011

Steffes v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court granted judicial review of an RCMP grievance decision, finding the delay in a transfer was not reasonably explained and the policy interpretation lacked justification.

  • Judicial review
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Interpretation of policy
  • Procedural fairness
  • Disclosure
  • Grievance process
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 1947

Haynes v. Canada

The Federal Court dismissed Mr. Haynes’s appeal, upholding the striking of his claim because the FPSLRA grievance scheme barred the action and left no jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Grievance process
  • Motion to strike
  • Federal public sector labour relations act s.236
  • Collective agreement
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Labour law 2025 FCA 154

Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers v. Patrice Laquerre’s

The Board reasonably applied heightened scrutiny because the employee could not grieve independently, found on the facts that the bargaining agent's expertise produced a closed mind and a superficial analysis amounting to arbitrary conduct, and lawfully concluded there was a breach of the duty of fair representation; the Court dismissed the judicial review as the Board's decision met the reasonableness standard.

  • Duty of fair representation
  • Interpretation of collective agreement
  • Standard of review
  • Union discretion
  • Grievance process
Read case analysis
Public employment law 2024 FCA 115

Davis v. Canada (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)

Subsection 236(1) of the FPSLRA unequivocally bars civil actions in respect of disputes relating to terms and conditions of employment; the appellant failed to establish any exception (such as complete corruption or incapacity of the grievance process), failed to show inadequate accommodation or reasonable apprehension of bias, and therefore it was plain and obvious to strike the statement of claim without leave to amend; the appeal is dismissed.

  • Jurisdictional ouster clause
  • Grievance process
  • Motion to strike
  • Judicial review
  • Duty to accommodate
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 FCA 105

Andruszkiewicz v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court correctly applied the reasonableness standard and properly assessed procedural fairness; the CBSA grievance decision, read together with the two investigation reports and the Advisor's précis, discloses the key bases for its conclusions, is reasonable, and there was no breach of the appellant's right to procedural fairness; therefore the appeal is dismissed.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of review
  • Judicial review
  • Harassment investigation
  • Grievance process
  • Reasonableness review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 CF 663

Lill c. Canada (Procureur Général)

La Cour fédérale accueille en partie le contrôle judiciaire d’un grief de détenu : seul le transfert d’urgence en secteur médium est annulé et renvoyé.

  • Judicial review
  • Harassment and reprisals
  • Prisoner transfers
  • Standard of review
  • Grievance process
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 FC 664

Lill v. Canada (Attorney General)

Federal Court dismissed Mr. Lill’s judicial review, finding one grievance-handling step unreasonable but refusing relief and upholding the rejection of retaliation allegations.

  • Security information reports
  • Grievance process
  • Procedural fairness
  • Retaliation/harassment
  • Source reliability and corroboration
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2023 FC 1103

Hoffman v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court found the grievance decision unreasonable and sent the matter back to the Final Authority for redetermination by a different decision maker.

  • Reasonableness review (vavilov)
  • Grievance process
  • Remedial measures (daod 5019-4)
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Abuse of process
  • Redetermination by administrative decision maker
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.