Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

R. v. Saddleback

The Supreme Court dismissed the Crown’s appeal in a second-degree murder case, holding the trial judge relied on an out-of-court statement as hearsay and that no curative proviso applied.

  • Hearsay
  • Sufficiency of reasons
  • Material misapprehension of evidence
  • Curative proviso
  • Second degree murder
  • Sufficiency-of-reasons
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 339

R. v. M.L.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding error in admitting a child’s hearsay statement under the principled exception and ordering a new trial on Count 2.

  • Hearsay
  • Principled exception
  • Threshold reliability
  • Similar fact evidence
  • Mistrial
  • Jury charge
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 303

R. v. S.S.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from sexual offence convictions, holding the trial judge’s reasons were sufficient and the mother’s evidence was largely hearsay.

  • Sexual offences
  • Credibility and reasons
  • Child witness evidence
  • Hearsay
  • Sufficiency of reasons
  • Motive to fabricate
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 39

R. v. Holder

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed Vernon Rudolph Holder’s conviction appeal and sentence appeal, upholding findings on credibility, hearsay, and sentencing.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Assault with a weapon
  • Hearsay - spontaneous utterances
  • Credibility findings
  • Downes credit for strict bail conditions
  • Mode of trial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 17

R. v. J.S.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed a sexual assault conviction appeal, holding the trial judge’s credibility findings were not inconsistent and that text messages were used only for context.

  • Sexual assault
  • Credibility assessment
  • Reasonable doubt
  • Hearsay
  • Recent fabrication
  • Sexual-assault
Read case analysis
Trusts and estates 2025 ONCA 902

Hugginson v. Hugginson

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an appeal over a $400,000 alleged inter vivos gift, upholding findings that the gift was not proven and Strong v. Bird did not apply.

  • Inter vivos gift
  • Strong v. bird doctrine
  • Business records admissibility (s.35 evidence act)
  • Hearsay and principled exception
  • Costs
  • Inter-vivos-gifts
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCCA 466

R. v. Rosbergen

The Court of Appeal set aside a single-justice order granting release pending appeal, holding the bail judge misapplied the public-interest test and ordered Rosbergen back into custody.

  • Release pending appeal
  • Public confidence vs enforceability
  • Strength of appeal assessment
  • Sentencing and parole ineligibility
  • Jury charge errors
  • Hearsay admission
Read case analysis
Medical negligence 2025 ONCA 851

Gumbley v. Vasiliou

Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed a medical negligence appeal, upholding findings that Dr. Vasiliou’s delays in intubation and escalation caused Ms. Gumbley’s brain injury.

  • Causation
  • Hearsay
  • Business records exception
  • Expert evidence
  • Adverse inference
  • Standard of care
Read case analysis
Bankruptcy and insolvency 2025 FC 1824

Canada v. 101137743 Saskatchewan Ltd.

The Federal Court granted summary judgment for an uncontested AMPA loan debt, but dismissed the fraud-based declaratory relief for lack of jurisdiction and insufficient pleading and evidence.

  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Summary judgment
  • Dischargeability in bankruptcy
  • Pleading requirements
  • Hearsay
  • Summary-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2025 NSSC 393

Glooscap First Nation v. Howard

The court admitted as narrative (not for the truth of their contents) affidavit passages that recount statements made by another affiant who will be available for cross-examination; the court struck or redacted passages that constituted pure hearsay, added details not contained in the declarant's affidavit, or amounted to opinion or argument. Specific paragraphs were ordered struck or redacted as set out in the orders.

  • Hearsay
  • Affidavit admissibility
  • Motion to strike
  • Narrative evidence
  • Opinion and argument in affidavits
  • Injunctions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.