Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD decision upholding refusal of a refugee claim, finding the DNA report inadmissible under s. 110(4) IRPA and the identity and credibility findings reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an RPD decision that found the applicant had not proved his identity as a Ghanaian, holding the decision was reasonable under Vavilov.
The Court of Appeal upheld convictions for dangerous driving and fentanyl offences, finding the trial judge reasonably identified the appellant as the BMW driver from the cumulative circumstantial evidence.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review applications challenging Refugee Protection Division vacation decisions that nullified the applicants’ Convention Refugee status under s. 109 IRPA.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a RAD decision, finding procedural unfairness in reply timing and an unreasonable refusal to hold an oral hearing.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la SAR ayant conclu que l’identité de la demanderesse n’était pas établie de façon crédible.
The trial judge did not err: he reasonably treated security camera timestamps as approximate measures supported by consistent timestamps across two cameras and by conceded accurate GPS data; taken with the surrounding circumstantial evidence (rental initials, DNA on water bottle, vehicle route and timing), the only reasonable inference was that the appellant was the shooter and the conviction was not unreasonable.
Source excerpt
The court acquitted Doyle Angus of sexual assault after finding it could not prove identity beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a RAD decision that found the applicant failed to prove Eritrean identity and upheld Ethiopian citizenship.
The court admitted limited evidence of an alleged 2017 robbery as discreditable conduct, finding it relevant to identity, motive, credibility, and narrative.
Explore more
