Keltic (Prior) Development Limited Partnership v. Van Renesse Investment Company Ltd.
The court struck multiple portions of the amended response because, assuming the pleaded facts, they disclosed no reasonable defence, were irrelevant or prejudicial: commercial negotiation precluded contra proferentem arguments; indemnity and "as is" clauses did not permit contracting out of the EMA; a purchase agreement with an indemnity clause is not an insurance contract under the Insurance Act; limitation and offset defences were inadequately pleaded. The court refused to extend time to file the proposed counterclaim because the proposed claim was legally weak, materially different in sub…
Source excerpt
- Indemnity clause
- Contaminated site remediation
- Strike pleadings
- Counterclaim extension
- Contra proferentem
- Duty of utmost good faith