Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed Antonio Utano’s judicial review of a CBSA grievance decision, finding the process reasonably addressed bias, fairness, and disclosure concerns.
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the denial of public interest standing because the nine applications chiefly challenged individual exercises of the Commissioner’s statutory discretion and did not raise serious justiciable issues of statutory interpretation or broader legal validity; moreover proceeding would conflict with the LRA’s confidentiality regime and statutory scheme, and the motion judge’s discretionary balancing of Downtown Eastside factors warranted deference.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to show state conduct that met the narrow residual abuse of process threshold: there was no deliberate nondisclosure or destruction of material evidence, the trial was fair, the LPS transferred carriage to the OPP before charges, and the involvement of the LPS did not, on the facts, create an institutional conflict so egregious as to undermine the integrity of the justice system.
Source excerpt
The court dismissed Mr. Tran’s judicial review of a WCAT decision, finding no procedural unfairness and no patently unreasonable error in the tribunal’s reasoning.
The Court dismissed a judicial review of an immediate roadside prohibition, holding that one reliable ASD result was sufficient and that no institutional bias was shown.
Appeal dismissed from judicial review upholding an immediate roadside driving prohibition. The court found no institutional bias at RoadSafetyBC and held the driver finding reasonable.
Judicial review of two cancelled refugee-hearing decisions was dismissed as moot; the Court declined to rule on whether the IRB Instructions were ultra vires or biased.
Judicial review of an immediate roadside driving prohibition was dismissed. The court held the adjudicator's credibility findings were reasonable and not tainted by manifestly flawed reasoning.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an H&C refusal, holding the officer reasonably weighed criminal inadmissibility, rehabilitation, family hardship and bias allegations.
The Federal Court held it had jurisdiction to review Canadian Judicial Council conduct proceedings, found the challenge was not premature, but rejected the bias claim.
Explore more
