Unified Fisheries Conservation Alliance v. Independent Fisheries Limited
Defendants failed to meet the persuasive burden to show that the Amended Statement of Claim lacked required material particulars under CPR 38.03(3); many demands sought evidentiary detail or information likely solely within defendants' knowledge and not material facts that must be pleaded. Given the regulatory complexity and public interest, disclosure/production and discovery are the appropriate mechanisms to develop the detailed factual record, so an order for further particulars is not warranted and the motion is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Particulars and pleading requirements
- Civil conspiracy
- Intentional interference with economic relations
- Unjust enrichment
- Trespass
- Novel tort doctrine