McGrail v. McGrail
The claimant failed to prove necessity and the minimum quantum required for an interim distribution under s.89 and effectively sought funds to fund litigation without adequate evidentiary support; the respondent established sufficient need but not for the full amount sought and an interim distribution of $30,000 from the net proceeds was an appropriate, proportionate exercise of the court's discretion under s.89 to partially level the playing field while avoiding harm to the claimant's interest.
Source excerpt
- Interim distribution under s.89 fla
- Excluded property claim
- Line of credit
- Legal costs
- Balancing the litigation playing field