Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed the MPCC’s judicial review applications, holding OPS conduct-complaint investigations are not policing duties or functions and disclosure was not compelled for the public interest investigation.
The Application for Judicial Review is dismissed because it was brought after the limitation period under Rule 7.05 had run (communication occurred in April 2024) and it amounts to a collateral attack and abuse of process in light of Justice Murray's prior, final decision in PtH 538503 which addressed timeliness and refused to extend time; mandamus was not available and the factual record did not justify reopening issues already decided.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal's finding that race and colour were factors in the City's decisions to suspend and terminate Mema was reasonable and supported by the evidentiary record; the chambers judge correctly dismissed the petition for judicial review and this Court will dismiss the appeal, deferring to the Tribunal's factual inferences and concluding any minor factual error was not material to the result.
Source excerpt
Federal Court granted judicial review of a refugee/permanent residence refusal, finding the decision relied on uncited evidence, misapplied the refugee test, and ignored a central allegation.
The ID is entitled, when applying paragraph 36(1)(b) IRPA, to consider extraneous circumstances that made the legal defence of duress not practically available in the foreign jurisdiction because duress goes to the voluntariness fundamental to criminal liability; the ID unreasonably failed to consider credible evidence that duress prevented the appellant from raising the defence and therefore the ID decision is set aside and the matter must be remitted for reconsideration.
Source excerpt
The Commission's remedy ordering staff‑assisted mediation and, if unsuccessful, final offer arbitration was a reasonable, discretionary response to an undue preference finding; its reasons were adequate when read in context, Rogers waived its complaint about new evidence, and claims that the Commission lacked power or was functus officio were either not raised below or unpersuasive; appeal and judicial review are dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Amended Record filed March 2, 2026 was not complete; the record must consist of all materials that were before the Senate Executive Committee. The Respondent must produce a paper Record comprising the March 2, 2026 Amended Record with specified additions and corrections: all hyperlinked documents used in submissions (with best efforts to retrieve broken links or a notation in the index if unobtainable), fulsome versions of missing-content PDFs (reactivation applications at Tab B(2) and Tab C(1)), attachments to the November 30, 2023 email consolidated in the same tab, and the hearing note…
Source excerpt
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IRCC refusal of a permanent residence application as incomplete, finding the officer reasonably relied on the application record.
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld s. 12 of the NSICOP Act, holding Parliament may limit parliamentary privilege by ordinary legislation under s. 18 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer failed to engage with key evidence and relied on speculative reasoning.
Explore more
