Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Trademark law 2026 FC 495

Federation of Asian Canadians Toronto v. Asialicious Holdings Inc.

FACT succeeded in part on passing off over ASIALICIOUS. The Court found FACT had prior goodwill, rejected the defendants’ prior-use claim, and granted a narrow injunction and nominal damages.

  • Goodwill
  • Distinctiveness
  • Contemporaneous use
  • Misrepresentation
  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Remedies
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2026 FC 114

996660 Ontario Ltd. v. Falesca Importing Ltd.

The Federal Court dismissed an appeal from the Trademarks Opposition Board and upheld refusal of the FALESCA MOLISANA trademark application.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Distinctiveness
  • Geographic descriptors and demonyms
  • State of the marketplace evidence
  • Standard of review
  • Trademarks
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2025 FC 1990

Fruiticana Produce Ltd. v. Fruitocana Inc.

The Federal Court found that Fruitocana infringed Fruiticana’s registered trademark, granted an injunction with a 30-day delay, and awarded $2,500 in costs.

  • Trademark infringement
  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Injunction
  • Default judgment
  • Costs
  • Trademark-infringement
Read case analysis
Trademark law 2025 FCA 212

Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Novartis AG

The Federal Court of Appeal held that the trial judge did not commit a reversible error: patients are a relevant class of consumers for the confusion analysis in this context, the surrounding circumstances (including oral communication and repackaging practices) supported a finding of likelihood of confusion between BEOVU and BYOOVIZ, passing off was established, and injunctive relief plus nominal damages ($20,000) were appropriate; the appeals and cross-appeals were dismissed.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Consumer attitude in confusion analysis
  • S.6(5) surrounding circumstances
  • Injunctive relief
  • Nominal damages
  • Accounting of profits
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2025 FC 1688

Yat Sun Food Products Ltd. v. Griffith Foods International Inc.

The Federal Court allowed Yat Sun’s trademark appeal, set aside the TMOB decision, and refused Griffith’s CHEF’S OWN application after finding confusion likely.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Registrability
  • Entitlement to registration
  • Distinctiveness
  • Admissibility of expert evidence
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis
Trademark law 2025 FC 1639

Schlegel Health Care Inc. v. Edgewood Health Network Inc.

The Federal Court dismissed Homewood’s interlocutory injunction motion over use of GUARDIANS, finding no strong prima facie case, insufficient goodwill, and no irreparable harm.

  • Unregistered trademark
  • Passing off under s.7(b) trademarks act
  • Irreparable harm
  • Rjr-macdonald interlocutory test
  • Cbc elevated threshold
  • Likelihood of confusion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2025 FC 1430

G6 Hospitality IP LLC v. Sandals Resorts International 2000 Inc.

The Federal Court dismissed G6 Hospitality’s appeal from a TMOB opposition decision, finding no reviewable error in the likelihood-of-confusion analysis for Sandals’ trademark application.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Degree of resemblance
  • Trademark family
  • Distinctiveness
  • Standard of review
  • Likelihood-of-confusion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2025 FC 1176

University of British Columbia v. Sage Dining Services Inc.

Federal Court appeal dismissed in a trademark opposition dispute between UBC and Sage Dining. The Court upheld findings on confusion, distinctiveness, and new evidence.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Distinctiveness
  • Trademark opposition
  • Standard of review
  • Admissibility and materiality of new evidence
  • Evidentiary burden
Read case analysis
Trademark law 2025 FC 179

T. Rowe Price Group Inc. v. Glidepath Technologies Inc.

The Federal Court allowed T. Rowe Price Group’s appeal, set aside the Trademarks Opposition Board’s decision, and directed refusal of the LIVE WITH CONFIDENCE application.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Degree of resemblance (s.6(5)(e))
  • Section 12(1)(d) registrability
  • Assessment of trademarks in totality
  • Palpable and overriding error
  • Correctness standard
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2025 FC 20

2K4 Inc. O/A Indican Pictures v. Indiecan Entertainment Inc.

The Federal Court dismissed 2K4 Inc.’s passing off application, finding no proven pre-2011 use of the Indican Pictures mark in Canada and no valid Canadian trademark right at the relevant date.

  • Use in canada
  • Goodwill
  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Relevant date for passing off
  • Evidentiary burden
  • Passing-off
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.