Cabalona v. Turney
The Family Law Act applies; on a s.89 assessment the court found both parties economically needy but Turney more disadvantaged (incapacity, low fixed income, cannot self-represent) and that a further large interim distribution to the claimant would likely harm Turney's interests given the disputed cohabitation agreement and prior $200,000 distribution; balancing necessity and potential harm, the court exercised its discretion to grant a limited interim distribution of $50,000 to Turney for future legal fees and disbursements only, and denied the claimant's application for a second interim dis…
Source excerpt
- Interim distribution
- Family law act s.89
- Cohabitation agreement enforceability
- Litigation funding
- Capacity and committee proceedings
- Consent orders