Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 1591

R. v. Johnson

Sentencing for assault with a weapon and dangerous driving arising from a vehicle incident at a Victoria protest. The court imposed 12 months’ imprisonment, concurrent 30 days, and probation.

  • Assault with a weapon
  • Dangerous driving
  • Conditional sentence
  • Aggravating factors
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Probation and ancillary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 ONCA 917

R. v. R.G.

The sentencing judge erred in principle by (1) treating the expert risk assessment as of limited or no value based on the absence of agreed facts without evidence the expert's opinion would change and by holding the appellant personally responsible for that omission, and (2) treating the appellant's mental health issues as a neutral factor when there was no basis to do so; those errors impacted the sentence and warranted reducing the sentence from six to five years concurrent, while upholding the application of the intimate partner aggravator.

  • Sexual assault
  • Unlawful confinement
  • Sentencing
  • Aggravating factors
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Intimate partner aggravator
Read case analysis
Professional discipline 2024 BCCA 350

Gregory v. The Law Society of British Columbia

Appeal from Law Society discipline partly succeeded: the court upheld misconduct for failing to make reasonable inquiries in suspicious circumstances, but set aside the client-identification finding.

  • Professional misconduct
  • Client identification
  • Duty to inquire
  • Money laundering risk
  • Solicitor vs. counsel duties
  • Mental health mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCCA 259

R. v. Hurley

The Court of Appeal dismissed a sentence appeal for sexual assault, holding the judge did not err in assessing mental health and childhood trauma, and the two-year jail term was fit.

  • Conditional sentence orders
  • Moral culpability
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Childhood trauma mitigation
  • Standard of review
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 NLCA 18

R. v. Trimm

Leave to appeal sentence granted; the 12‑month sentence for distribution of child pornography is not demonstrably unfit and is upheld; the sentence for child luring was demonstrably unfit and is reduced to 12 months, to be served consecutively, producing a total of 24 months imprisonment; the Court declined to decide the Charter s.12 challenge to the mandatory minimum for distribution because it would not affect the result and resolution is better left to the Supreme Court of Canada.

  • Child pornography
  • Child luring
  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Charter s.12 (cruel and unusual punishment)
  • Sentencing principles (proportionality, parity, totality)
  • Mental health mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 699

R. v. K.N.R.H.

Sentencing reasons in a sexual offences case involving a minor, where the court imposed 48 months on the main count, concurrent 90-day terms, and ancillary orders.

  • Sexual interference
  • Sexual assault
  • Exposure
  • Uttering threats
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Friesen sentencing guidance
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2023 FC 37

Vellani v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of an RCMP conduct appeal was dismissed. The Court found no breach of procedural fairness and held the dismissal sanction was reasonable overall.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Reasonableness review
  • Disciplinary appeal
  • Admission of new evidence
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Mcneil disclosure considerations
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 ONCA 494

R. v. Fabbro

The sentencing judge committed errors in principle by failing to account for the appellant's suicidal intent and the attenuated danger to the public and by failing to determine whether there was a causal link between the appellant's mental health/addiction and the offence; those errors affected the sentence and warranted appellate substitution of a two-year-less-a-day conditional sentence on agreed terms.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Conditional sentence
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Credit for time under restrictive bail (downes)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2019 BCCA 418

R. v. Hashemi

Appeal from a fentanyl trafficking sentence dismissed. The Court of Appeal held the judge properly considered mitigation, parity, and exceptional circumstances, and the 12-month custodial term was not unfit.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Exceptional circumstances
  • Parity
  • Trafficking in fentanyl
  • Rehabilitation
  • Deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2019 NSPC 17

R. v. Sutherland

Given the high statutory maximum but the offender's low degree of moral blameworthiness, youth, lack of prior record, cooperation, genuine remorse, demonstrable rehabilitation efforts and compliance with strict release conditions, the appropriate and proportionate sentence is to suspend passing of sentence and impose a 36-month probation order with strict residential, supervisory, treatment, community service and non-association conditions; impose mandatory DNA collection under s.487.051 and a ten-year firearms prohibition under s.109(2).

  • Conspiracy
  • Robbery
  • Sentencing
  • Probation
  • Ancillary orders (dna collection)
  • Firearms prohibition
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.