Queen’s Marque Developments Limited v. Gamma Windows and Walls International Inc.
Although the Patina Purchase Order contained a valid exclusive Ontario jurisdiction clause, the court declined to enforce it because Gamma had already commenced related proceedings in Ontario and the third party claim against SML is highly intertwined with the Nova Scotia action; allowing separate proceedings would be inefficient, waste judicial and party resources, and risk inconsistent findings, and the material evidence is more readily available in Nova Scotia, constituting 'strong cause' to refuse enforcement of the clause and permit the Nova Scotia court to determine the third party clai…
Source excerpt
- Forum selection clause
- Stay of proceedings
- Jurisdiction
- Third party claims
- Indemnity and contribution
- Multiplicity of proceedings