British Columbia (Minister of Education and Child Care) v. Duncan
Appeal dismissed. It was not plain and obvious that the procedural fairness or bad faith/improper purpose allegations had no reasonable prospect of success; the chambers judge did not err in refusing to strike those allegations and in ordering production of documents (including specified extra‑record communications and a detailed list of Cabinet records) necessary for the court to fulfil its supervisory role on judicial review; document production orders were within the chambers judge's discretion and are entitled to deference.
Source excerpt
- Procedural fairness
- Bad faith
- Improper purpose
- Order in council
- Record on judicial review
- Extra-record evidence