Sky v. Toronto-Dominion Bank
It is not plain and obvious that the disputed pleading is a collateral attack or abuse of process because it does not contradict the order nisi, alleges independent actionable wrongs (breach of contract/duty of good faith) that were not and could not meaningfully have been raised at the order nisi hearing, and permitting the pleadings will not cause manifest unfairness or bring the administration of justice into disrepute; therefore the chambers judge erred and the amendments should be permitted.
Source excerpt
- Collateral attack
- Abuse of process
- Order nisi
- Foreclosure
- Good faith in contractual discretion
- Amendment of pleadings