Glooscap First Nation v. Howard
The applicants proved a cause of action in trespass because the respondent exceeded and vitiated conditional, gratuitous consent, refused to comply with a reasonable cease‑and‑desist direction and continued unauthorized construction and commercial activity; alternative remedies were inadequate and equitable discretionary considerations did not bar relief (no fiduciary duty to the individual, no reliance on an illegal contract by the applicants); accordingly a permanent injunction protecting all Glooscap First Nation reserve lands, requiring removal of structures and prohibiting unauthorized c…
Source excerpt
- Trespass
- Permanent injunction
- Consent to occupation
- Fiduciary duty
- Illegality
- Lease negotiations