Tewari v. Hantover Canada Inc.
The motion judge did not err: the statement of claim was properly found duplicative, frivolous and an abuse of process and could be struck under rr.21.01(3)(c),(d) and r.25.11; leave to amend was properly refused; the permanent stay and striking of the claim are affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Permanent stay
- Duplicative pleading
- Striking pleadings
- Leave to amend
- Frivolous and vexatious
- Rules of civil procedure r.21.01(3) and r.25.11