R. v. A.L.
Appeal from convictions for sexual assault-related offences and uttering threats dismissed. The court upheld bad-character evidence, jury directions, and exclusion of a video.
- Admissibility of evidence
- Bad character/extrinsic misconduct
- Consent and honest but mistaken belief
- Crossâexamination limits (seaboyer)
- Limiting instructions
- Position of trust/authority