Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2192

R. v. Watroba

Trial judgment on drug trafficking and weapon charges: acquittals on trafficking counts, convictions for simple possession of fentanyl and for possessing a machete for a dangerous purpose.

  • Possession for purpose of trafficking
  • Simple possession
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Expert evidence limits
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 2039

R. v. Russell

Sentencing reasons for a firearm attack on the Vanderhoof RCMP detachment. The court imposed 10 years total, with one count stayed under Kienapple.

  • Reckless discharge of firearm
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Kienapple principle
  • Mental illness mitigation in sentencing
  • Totality principle
  • Ancillary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 1123

R. v. Russell

The court acquitted on attempted murder and two firearm/driving counts, but convicted on reckless firearm discharge, weapon possession, flight from police, and mischief offences.

  • Attempted murder
  • Reckless discharge of a firearm
  • Mischief
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Careless transportation/use of firearm
  • Flight from peace officer
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 871

R. v. Correa

The Court dismissed the appeal: the jury was properly instructed that intent to sexually assault was the core element and the Crown was not required to prove the precise method of access; the convictions were reasonable on circumstantial evidence and consistent with acquittals on other counts; and the dangerous offender designation was reasonable based on the uncontroverted expert evidence and the appellant’s psychiatric and criminal history.

  • Voyeurism
  • Attempted sexual assault
  • Dangerous offender designation
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Mens rea
  • Circumstantial evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 NSSC 13

R. v. Horton

Given the use of a knife to inflict a serious, permanently scarring injury to the victim's face, the offender's record, his flight from police and limited near-term prospects for rehabilitation, a custodial sentence of four years was the least restrictive sentence that reflected his moral culpability; related offences receive short concurrent sentences; ancillary orders (life weapons prohibition, DNA, forfeiture) and restitution for lost wages are appropriate.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Common assault
  • Resisting arrest
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Sentencing principles
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 NSPC 20

R v. Robinson

Balancing denunciation, specific deterrence, proportionality, parity and limited mitigation (including Gladue context and harsher COVID remand conditions), the appropriate global sentence is four years' custody (1,460 days) with 1.5 days remand credit for 300 days (450 days) resulting in a go‑forward custody term of 1,010 days; concurrent shorter sentences for related counts, count 4 stayed; ancillary orders imposed (10‑year firearms prohibition, DNA order, no contact in custody).

  • Aggravated assault
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Breach of undertaking
  • Sentencing principles
  • Remand credit
  • Gladue/ipeelee considerations
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 1833

R. v. Miller

Sentencing for break and enter, threats, and weapon possession, with Gladue factors, rehabilitation, and ancillary orders including probation and a weapons ban.

  • Break and enter
  • Uttering threats
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Gladue factors and rehabilitation
  • Weapons prohibition (s.110)
  • Dna data bank order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 NSSC 210

R. v. Lewis

The Crown failed to prove identity beyond a reasonable doubt: the identification evidence (complainant and Dustin) is inconsistent and not credible in material respects, there is no forensic or electronic corroboration, and the late-disclosed alibi by the accused (supported by family testimony) raises a reasonable doubt; accordingly the accused must be acquitted.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Assault with a weapon
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Theft of motor vehicle
  • Identification evidence
  • Alibi
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 BCSC 545

R. v. Randhawa

After a jury convicted him of five aggravated assaults and one weapons offence, the court imposed concurrent jail terms, probation, DNA and weapons orders.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Self-defence
  • Probation
  • Ancillary orders
  • Victim surcharge
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 2595

R. v. K.M.

The court convicted K.M. of sexual assault, assault with a weapon, weapon possession and threats, but acquitted him of unlawful confinement.

  • Unlawful confinement (psychological confinement)
  • Sexual assault and consent
  • Assault with a weapon
  • Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
  • Uttering threats
  • Credibility and reliability of complainant
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.