Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court dismissed a father's application for primary residence and education control, finding no basis to disrupt the children's existing shared parenting status quo.
The court granted the claimant sole parental responsibility for E., kept E.'s primary residence with the claimant, allowed travel without consent, and imposed targeted conduct restrictions and penalties.
Shared parenting and joint decision‑making were denied because the parties cannot sustain the level of cooperation required; on balance the mother is the better positioned primary caregiver given her history as primary caregiver, greater knowledge of the children’s medical needs, completion of remedial services addressing family violence, household stability and support from extended family, and concerns about the father's driving history, outstanding fines and criminal charges; therefore the mother is awarded primary residence and decision‑making with specified parenting time for the father.
Source excerpt
Appeal from a parenting and child support order allowed in part. The court upheld the primary residence ruling and pension-income analysis, but corrected arrears and summer support timing.
Interim family-law orders granted in part: primary residence stayed with the claimant, the respondent received structured parenting time, supervised monitoring ended, and a s. 211 report was ordered.
Court granted joint guardianship, mother primary residence, increased father parenting time, retroactive and ongoing child support, and communication conduct orders.
The court ordered the child to primarily reside with the Claimant, set aside the parenting-time portions of the parties’ agreement, and allowed supervised contact for the Respondent.
The court dismissed the claimant’s bid for equal parenting time, kept primary residence with the respondent, and ordered a graduated interim parenting schedule.
Interim family-law orders were granted to reflect the child’s primary residence with the respondent, final decision-making authority, and related travel and document orders.
The court dismissed a family-law application to vacate consent orders, kept the parenting restrictions in place, extended a protection order briefly, and narrowed a conduct order about counsel online.
Explore more
