Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Real property 2020 BCSC 637

Forjay Management Ltd. v. 0981478 B.C. Ltd.

The court held 625536 B.C. Ltd.’s mortgage security was statute-barred, but its debt claim remained enforceable. The court also rejected an equitable mortgage for forbearance fees.

  • Equitable mortgage
  • Forbearance fees
  • Statute of limitations
  • Acknowledgement
  • Priority agreements
  • Foreclosure procedure
Read case analysis
Real property 2020 BCSC 420

TCC Mortgage Holdings Inc. v. Rohland

The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed an application to cancel a CPL, finding no proof that the hardship was caused solely by the CPL. Security for costs was also denied.

  • Certificate of pending litigation
  • Resulting/constructive trust
  • Priority agreements
  • Security for costs
  • Summary judgment
  • Hardship and inconvenience
Read case analysis
Property law 2019 BCSC 190

TCC Mortgage Holdings Inc. v. Rohland

The court refused to cancel a certificate of pending litigation over a Bowen Island property, but ordered disclosure of documents and an undertaking as to damages.

  • Certificate of pending litigation
  • Cancellation of cpl for hardship and inconvenience
  • Document production and disclosure obligations
  • Priority agreements
  • Constructive trust/nominee allegations
  • Undertaking as to damages
Read case analysis
Contract law 2001 BCCA 545

Salico Property Marketing Corp. v. Instafund Financial Services

The Court of Appeal dismissed Salico’s appeals, holding the mortgage commitment incorporated a no-obligation-to-advance clause and did not novate the existing mortgage.

  • No obligation to advance clause
  • Breach of contract
  • Funding commitments
  • Novation
  • Foreclosure
  • Priority agreements
Read case analysis
Property law 2001 BCSC 744

Fraser Valley Credit Union v. Siba

The court held that promissory estoppel did not apply, but ordered Fraser Valley’s mortgage to rank ahead of Household’s on the basis of unjust enrichment.

  • Priority of mortgages
  • Promissory estoppel
  • Representative estoppel
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Priority agreements
  • Unjust-enrichment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.